Медицинская литература. Новинки

 

 

 

 

 

 

Миниинвазивные вмешательства при остром холецистите: состояние проблемы по данным доказательной медицины

Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf

Ключевые слова:

Литература:
1. Савельев В.С., Магомедов, В.И., Ревякин, П.А. др. Влияние
операции холецистэктомии на моторику органов желудочнокишечного тракта. // Эндоскоп. хирургия. 2007. № 3.
С. 32–38.
2. Keus F., Broeders C.J., van Laarhoven H.M. Surgical aspects of
symptomatic cholecystolithiasis and acute cholecystitis. // Best
Pract. Re. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006. V. 20. N 6. Р. 1031–1051.
3. Quality Assessment tool for quantitative studies // The Effective
Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). 2009 [электронный
ресурс]. URL: http://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/Quality%20
Assessment%20Tool_2010_2.pdf [дата обращения 10.
10.2010].
4. Gray JAM. Evidencebased healthcare / Churchill Livingstone.
London, 2002.
5. Burton M., Clarke M. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions // Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2006. V. 86. P. 101–114.
6. Guyatt G., Gutterman D., Baumann MH. et al. Grading strength
of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task
force // Chest. 2006. V. 129. N 1. Р. 17481.
7. 10 questions to help you make sense of reviews / The Public
Health Resource Unit. 2006 [электронный ресурс]. URL:
http://ssrc.tums.ac.ir/SystematicReview/Assets/CASP.pdf [дата обращения 10. 10.2010].
8. 10 questions to help you make sense of randomized controlled
trials / The Public Health Resource Unit. 2006. [электронный
ресурс]. URL: http://www.sph.nhs.uk/sphfiles/rct%20appraisal%20tool.pdf [дата обращения 10. 10.2010].
9. McCulloch P., Badenoch D. Finding and Appraising Evidence //
Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2006. V. 86. P. 41–57.
10. Levels of Evidence / Oxford centre for evidence based medicine.
2009. [электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.cebm.net/
index.aspx?o=1025 [дата обращения 10. 10.2010].
11. Sauerland S. et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies
Evidencebased guidelines of the European Association for
Endoscopic Surgery // Surg. Endoscор. 2006. V. 20. P. 14–29.
12. Papi C., Catarci M., D’Ambrosio L. et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a metaanalysis // Am. J.
Gastroenterol. 2004. V. 99. P. 147–155.
13. Shikata S., Noguchi Y. Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for
acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials // Surg. Today. 2005. V. 35. N 7. P. 553–560.
14. Lau H., Patil N.G., Yuen W.K. et al. Early versus delayed-interval
laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis – a metaanalysis // Surg. Endoscор. 2006. V. 20. P. 82–87.
15. Siddiqu T., MacDonald А., Chong P.S. et al. Early versus delayed
laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials // Am. J. Surg. 2008. V. 195.
N 1. Р. 40–47.
16. Lai P.B.S., Kwong K.H., Leung K.L. et al. Randomised trial of
early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute
cholecystitis // Brit. J. Surg. 1998. V. 85. P. 764–767.
17. Lo C.M., Liu C.L., Fan S.T. Prospective randomized study of
early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute
cholecystitis // Wong. J. Ann. Surg. 1998. V. 227. P. 461–467.
18. Chandler C.F, Lane J.S., Ferguson P. et al. Prospective evaluation
of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis // Am. Surg. 2000. V. 66. P. 896–900.
19. Johansson M., Thun A., Blomqvist R.N. et al. Management of
acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2003. V. 7.
Р. 642–645.
20. Serralta A.S., Bueno J.L., Planells M.R. et al. Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy
for early cholecystitis // Surg. Laparoscop. Endoscop. Percut.
Tech. 2003. V. 13. P. 71–75.
21. Kolla S.B., Aggarwal S., Kumar A. et al. Early vs delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis // Surg.
Endoscop. 2004. V. 18. P. 1323–1327.
22. Kiviluoto T., Siren J., Luukkonen P. et al. Randomised trial of
laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis // Lancet. 1998. V. 351. P. 321–325.
23. Johansson M., Thune A., Nelvin L. et al. Randomized clinical
trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment
of acute cholecystitis // Brit. J. Surg . 2005. V. 92. N 1. Р. 44–49.
24. Rai R., Sinha A., Rai S. Randomized clinical trial of open versus
laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis // Brit. J. Surg. 2005. V. 92. P. 44–49.
25. Catena F., Ansaloni L., Di Saverio S. et al. The ACTIVE (Acute
Cholecystitis Trial Invasive Versus Endoscopic) study: Multicenter randomized, doubleblind, controlled trial of laparoscopic (LC) versus open (LTC) surgery for acute cholecystitis
(AC) in adults. // licensee BioMed Central Ltd. [электронный
ресурс]. URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
[дата обращения 10. 10.2010].
26. Borzellino G., Sauerland S., Minicozzi M. A. et al. Laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis
of results // Surg. Endoscop. 2008. V. 22. P. 8–15.
27. O’Dwyer P.J., McGregor E.W.M,. McDermott J.J. Patient recovery following cholecystectomy through a 6 cm or 15 cm transverse subcostal incision: a prospective randomized clinical trial
// Postgrad. Med. J. 1992. V. 68. P. 817–819.
28. Ros A., Gustafsson L., Krook H. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective,
randomized, singleblind study // Ann. Surg. 2001. V. 234.
P. 741–749.
29. McMahon A.J., Ross J.N., Baxter I.T. et al. Symptomatic outcome 1 year after laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial // Brit. J. Surg. 1995. V. 82. P. 1378–1382.
30. Keus F., Hein G.G. Open, smallincision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.
An overview of Cochrane HepatoBiliary Group reviews //
Cochr. Database. Syst. Rev. 2010. V. I. N 1. P. CD008318.
31. Lee P.1C., Lo C., Lai P.1S. Randomized clinical trial of singleincision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic
cholecystectomy // Brit. J. Surg. 2010. V. 97. P. 1007–1012.
32. Ito K., Fujita N., Noda Y. et al. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy
Versus Gallbladder Aspiration for Acute Cholecystitis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. // Am. J. Radiol. 2004.
V. 183. P. 193–196.
33. Itoi T., Nayantara C.1P., Baron T.H. Endoscopic gallbladder
drainage for management of acute cholecystitis. // Gastrointest.
Endoscoy. 2010. V. 71. N. 6 P. 1038–1045.
34. Winbladh A., Gullstrand P., Svanvik J. et al. Systematic review of
cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. //
J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2009. V. 11. P. 183–193.
35. Hatzidakis А., Prassopoulos P. Acute cholecystitis in high-risk
patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment // Eur. Radiol. 2002. V. 12. N 7. P. 1778–1784.
36. Akyürek N., Salman B. Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in highrisk patients: percutaneous cholecystotomy followed

Minimally Invasive Interventions in Acute Cholecystitis: State of Art Concernig Evidence Based Medicine

Keywords: