Новости | Магазин | Журналы | Контакты | Правила | Доставка | |
Вход Регистрация |
Феохромоцитомы и параганглиомы (ФХ/ПГ) - редкие катехоламин-секретирующие нейроэндокринные опухоли, почти в 40% случаев имеющие наследственную природу. Заболеваемость колеблется от 2 до 8 случаев на 1 млн человек в год, с пиком заболеваемости в 30-50 лет. Согласно последней классификации, хромаффинные опухоли отнесены к злокачественным новообразованиям. Частота метастазирования ФХ - 10%, ПГ - 25%. Клинические проявления ФХ и ПГ обусловлены избытком катехоламинов. Известно более 20 наследуемых генов, мутации в которых провоцируют развитие ФХ/ПГ. С точки зрения молекулярной клеточной патофизиологии известный на сегодня пул мутаций можно разделить на два кластера: первый (i>SDHх, SDHAF2/i> - фактор сборки SDH, FH, MDH2) нарушает функционирование цикла Кребса и энергетической транспортной цепи митохондрий, второй (i>RET, NF1, TMEM127, MAX/i>) - мутации генов рецепторов трансмембранных белков-протеинкиназ (тирозинкиназ), активирующие внутриклеточные сигнальные пути (PI3K-AKT-mTOR и MYC), ответственные за клеточный рост, регуляцию роста и дифференцировку клеток. В итоге происходят стабилизация HIF-транскрипционных факторов (оксидативный стресс), изменение метилирования ДНК, приводящие в итоге к глубоким нарушениям экспрессии генов и опухолевой трансформации клетки. Выделяют три основных секреторно-биохимических фенотипа ФХ/ПГ: норадренергический, адренергический и допаминергический. В зависимости от типа секреции опухоли, возраста пациента и семейного анамнеза назначаются комплементарные генетические исследования и методы молекулярной визуализации. В клинической практике биохимический фенотип опухоли, стадия, семейный анамнез и особенно генетический “паспорт” опухоли позволяют подобрать оптимальный алгоритм молекулярной визуализации (ОФЭКТ/ПЭТ) в целях персонализации тактики лечения и клинического прогноза.
Ключевые слова:
хромаффинные опухоли, феохромоцитома, параганглиома, радионуклидная диагностика, молекулярная визуализация, генетика, эндокринология, онкология, радиология, онкоэндокринология, chromaffin tumors, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, radionuclide diagnostics, molecular visualization, genetics, endocrinology, oncology, radiology, oncoradiology
Литература:
1.McNeil AR, Blok BH, Koelmeyer TD, et al. Phaeochromocytomas discovered during coronial autopsies in Sydney, Melbourne and Auckland. Aust N Z J Med. 2000;30(6):648-652. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb04358.x.
2.Kopetschke R, Slisko M, Kilisli A, et al. Frequent incidental discovery of phaeochromocytoma: data from a German cohort of 201 phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(2):355-361. doi: 10.1530/EJE-09-0384.
3.Young WF, Jr. Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Rochester, Minnesota. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2000;29(1):159-185, x. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70122-5.
4.Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al. Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1459-1466. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020152.
5.Lam AK. Update on Adrenal Tumours in 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) of Endocrine Tumours. Endocr Pathol. 2017;28(3):213-227. doi: 10.1007/s12022-017-9484-5.
6.Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K. Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2005;366(9486):665-675. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67139-5.
7.Pacak K, Linehan WM, Eisenhofer G, et al. Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(4):315-329. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00016.
8.Whalen RK, Althausen AF, Daniels GH. Extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. J Urol. 1992;147(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37119-7.
9.Unsicker K, Huber K, Schober A, Kalcheim C. Resolved and open issues in chromaffin cell development. Mech Dev. 2013;130(6-8):324-329. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2012.11.004.
10.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Pacak K. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Front Horm Res. 2004;31:76-106. doi: 10.1159/000074659.
11.Taieb D, Kaliski A, Boedeker CC, et al. Current approaches and recent developments in the management of head and neck paragangliomas. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(5):795-819. doi: 10.1210/er.2014-1026.
12.Erickson D, Kudva YC, Ebersold MJ, et al. Benign paragangliomas: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes in 236 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(11):5210-5216. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.11.8034.
13.Bravo EL, Tagle R. Pheochromocytoma: state-of-the-art and future prospects. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(4):539-553. doi: 10.1210/er.2002-0013.
14.Martucci VL, Pacak K. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: diagnosis, genetics, management, and treatment. Curr Probl Cancer. 2014;38(1):7-41. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2014.01.001.
15.Strong VE, Kennedy T, Al-Ahmadie H, et al. Prognostic indicators of malignancy in adrenal pheochromocytomas: clinical, histopathologic, and cell cycle/apoptosis gene expression analysis. Surgery. 2008;143(6):759-768. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.02.007.
16.Ayala-Ramirez M, Feng L, Johnson MM, et al. Clinical risk factors for malignancy and overall survival in patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas: primary tumor size and primary tumor location as prognostic indicators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2011;96(3):717-725. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1946.
17.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Siegert G, et al. Plasma methoxytyramine: a novel biomarker of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in relation to established risk factors of tumour size, location and SDHB mutation status. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(11):1739-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.016.
18.Leung K, Stamm M, Raja A, Low G. Pheochromocytoma: the range of appearances on ultrasound, CT, MRI, and functional imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):370-378. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9126.
19.Thompson LD. Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score (PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(5):551-566.
20.Takano A, Oriuchi N, Tsushima Y, et al. Detection of metastatic lesions from malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with 18F-FDG positron emission tomography and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med.2008;22(5):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s12149-008-0128-1.
21.Dahia PL. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma pathogenesis: learning from genetic heterogeneity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(2):108-119. doi: 10.1038/nrc3648.
22.Cascon A, Inglada-Perez L, Comino-Mendez I, et al. Genetics of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in Spanish pediatric patients. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20(3):L1-6. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0339.
23.Kaelin WG, Jr. The von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein: O2 sensing and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8(11):865-873. doi: 10.1038/nrc2502.
24.Latif F, Tory K, Gnarra J, et al. Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science. 1993;260(5112):1317-1320. doi: 10.1126/science.8493574.
25.Gnarra JR, Tory K, Weng Y, et al. Mutations of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma. Nat Genet. 1994;7(1):85-90. doi: 10.1038/ng0594-85.
26.Eisenhofer G, Huynh TT, Pacak K, et al. Distinct gene expression profiles in norepinephrine- and epinephrine-producing hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytomas: activation of hypoxia-driven angiogenic pathways in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. Endocr Relat Cancer.2004;11(4):897-911. doi: 10.1677/erc.1.00838.
27.Gimm O, Koch CA, Januszewicz A, et al. The genetic basis of pheochromocytoma. Front Horm Res. 2004;31:45-60. doi: 10.1159/000074657.
28.Aufforth RD, Ramakant P, Sadowski SM, et al. Pheochromocytoma screening initiation and frequency in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(12):4498-4504. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3045.
29.Lonser RR, Glenn GM, Walther M, et al. von Hippel-Lindau disease. Lancet. 2003;361(9374):2059-2067. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13643-4.
30.Burnichon N, Vescovo L, Amar L, et al. Integrative genomic analysis reveals somatic mutations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(20):3974-3985. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr324.
31.Raue F, Frank-Raue K. Update multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Fam Cancer. 2010;9(3):449-457. doi: 10.1007/s10689-010-9320-2.
32.Wells SA, Jr., Asa SL, Dralle H, et al. Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2015;25(6):567-610. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0335.
33.Jain S, Encinas M, Johnson EM, Jr., Milbrandt J. Critical and distinct roles for key RET tyrosine docking sites in renal development. Genes Dev. 2006;20(3):321-333. doi: 10.1101/gad.1387206.
34.Milos IN, Frank-Raue K, Wohllk N, et al. Age-related neoplastic risk profiles and penetrance estimations in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A caused by germ line RET Cys634Trp (TGC>TGG) mutation. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15(4):1035-1041. doi: 10.1677/ERC-08-0105.
35.Choi SK, Yoon SR, Calabrese P, Arnheim N. Positive selection for new disease mutations in the human germline: evidence from the heritable cancer syndrome multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(2):e1002420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002420.
36.Waguespack SG, Rich T, Grubbs E, et al. A current review of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(5):2023-2037. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2830.
37.Boyd KP, Korf BR, Theos A. Neurofibromatosis type 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(1):1-14; quiz 15-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.051.
38.Fishbein L, Nathanson KL. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: understanding the complexities of the genetic background. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.01.009.
39.Hoekstra AS, Bayley JP. The role of complex II in disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1827(5):543-551. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.11.005.
40.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287(5454):848-851. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848.
41.Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al. Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA. 2004;292(8):943-951. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.8.943.
42.Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, et al. The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2817-2827. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2504.
43.Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):1915-1942. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1498.
44.Castro-Vega LJ, Buffet A, De Cubas AA, et al. Germline mutations in FH confer predisposition to malignant pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(9): 2440-2446. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt639.
45.Yao L, Schiavi F, Cascon A, et al. Spectrum and prevalence of FP/TMEM127 gene mutations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. JAMA. 2010;304(23):2611-2619. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1830.
46.Neumann HP, Sullivan M, Winter A, et al. Germline mutations of the TMEM127 gene in patients with paraganglioma of head and neck and extraadrenal abdominal sites. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(8):E1279-1282. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0114.
47.Comino-Mendez I, Gracia-Aznarez FJ, Schiavi F, et al. Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet. 2011;43(7): 663-667. doi: 10.1038/ng.861.
48.Burnichon N, Cascon A, Schiavi F, et al. MAX mutations cause hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(10):2828-2837. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0160.
49.Burnichon N, Buffet A, Parfait B, et al. Somatic NF1 inactivation is a frequent event in sporadic pheochromocytoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(26):5397-5405. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds374.
50.Welander J, Larsson C, Backdahl M, et al. Integrative genomics reveals frequent somatic NF1 mutations in sporadic pheochromocytomas. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(26):5406-5416. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds402.
51.Eisenhofer G, Lenders JW, Goldstein DS, et al. Pheochromocytoma catecholamine phenotypes and prediction of tumor size and location by use of plasma free metanephrines. Clin Chem. 2005;51(4):735-744. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.045484.
52.Kantorovich V, Pacak K. A new concept of unopposed beta-adrenergic overstimulation in a patient with pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 1):1026-1028. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_Part_1-200506210-00023.
53.Olson SW, Deal LE, Piesman M. Epinephrine-secreting pheochromocytoma presenting with cardiogenic shock and profound hypocalcemia. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(10):849-851. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-10-200405180-00033.
54.Van Der Horst-Schrivers AN, Osinga TE, Kema IP, et al. Dopamine excess in patients with head and neck paragangliomas. Anticancer Res. 2010;30(12):5153-5158.
55.Crona J, Taieb D, Pacak K. New perspectives on pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: toward a molecular classification. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(6):489-515. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00062.
56.Darr R, Kuhn M, Bode C, et al. Accuracy of recommended sampling and assay methods for the determination of plasma-free and urinary fractionated metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a systematic review. Endocrine. 2017;56(3):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1300-y.
57.Eisenhofer G, Goldstein DS, Sullivan P, et al. Biochemical and clinical manifestations of dopamine-producing paragangliomas: utility of plasma methoxytyramine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(4):2068-2075. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2025.
58.Eisenhofer G, Peitzsch M. Laboratory evaluation of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Chem. 2014;60(12): 1486-1499. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.224832.
59.Jasperson KW, Kohlmann W, Gammon A, et al. Role of rapid sequence whole-body MRI screening in SDH-associated hereditary paraganglioma families. Fam Cancer. 2014;13(2): 257-265. doi: 10.1007/s10689-013-9639-6.
60.Ilias I, Pacak K. Current approaches and recommended algorithm for the diagnostic localization of pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2):479-491. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031091.
61.Ilias I, Pacak K. Diagnosis, localization and treatment of pheochromocytoma in MEN 2 syndrome. Endocr Regul. 2009;43(2):89-93. doi: 10.4149/endo_2009_02_89.
62.Park BK, Kim CK, Kwon GY, Kim JH. Re-evaluation of pheochromocytomas on delayed contrast-enhanced CT: washout enhancement and other imaging features. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(11):2804-2809. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0695-x.
63.Northcutt BG, Raman SP, Long C, et al. MDCT of adrenal masses: Can dual-phase enhancement patterns be used to differentiate adenoma and pheochromocytoma? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(4):834-839. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9753.
64.Alderazi Y, Yeh MW, Robinson BG, et al. Phaeochromocytoma: current concepts. Med J Aust. 2005;183(4):201-204.
65.Quint LE, Glazer GM, Francis IR, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: comparison of MR imaging with CT and I-131 MIBG scintigraphy. Radiology. 1987;165(1):89-93. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.1.3628794.
66.Velchik MG, Alavi A, Kressel HY, Engelman K. Localization of pheochromocytoma: MIBG [correction of MIGB], CT, and MRI correlation. J Nucl Med. 1989;30(3):328-336.
67.Sahdev A, Sohaib A, Monson JP, et al. CT and MR imaging of unusual locations of extra-adrenal paragangliomas (pheochromocytomas). Eur Radiol. 2005;15(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2412-3.
68.Varghese JC, Hahn PF, Papanicolaou N, et al. MR differentiation of phaeochromocytoma from other adrenal lesions based on qualitative analysis of T2 relaxation times. Clin Radiol. 1997; 52(8):603-606. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80252-8.
69.Jalil ND, Pattou FN, Combemale F, et al. Effectiveness and limits of preoperative imaging studies for the localisation of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a review of 282 cases. French Association of Surgery (AFC), and The French Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AFCE). Eur J Surg. 1998;164(1):23-28. doi: 10.1080/110241598750004913.
70.Mayo-Smith WW, Lee MJ, McNicholas MM, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses ( 5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging: observer performance versus quantitative measures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165(1):91-95. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.1.7785642.
71.Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al. Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. October 2005. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3(2):92-102. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0396.
72.Taieb D, Timmers H, Hindie E, et al. EANM 2012 guidelines for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1977-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2215-8.
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumours, up to 40% of which occur in the setting of a hereditary syndrome. The incidence is 2 to 8 per million persons per year. The peak incidence occurs in the third to fifth decades of life. According to the most recent classification, chromaffin tumours refer to malignant neoplasms. The incidence of metastasis in pheochromocytomas is 10%; in paragangliomas it is 25%. Clinical manifestations of PPGLs are caused by the excess of catecholamines. More than 20 hereditary gene mutations are known to result in PPGLs development. According to the molecular and cellular pathophysiology, all currently known mutations can be divided into 2 groups: the first group - i>SDH/i>i>х/i>i>, SDHAF2/i> (the assembly factor of SDH, FH, MDH2) - disrupts the Krebs cycle and mitochondrial energy transport chain; the second group - i>RET, NF1, TMEM127, MAX/i> - leads to mutations in receptor protein kinases (tyrosine kinase), activating intracellular signal pathways (PI3K-AKT-mTOR and MYC), which are responsible for cell growth, growth regulation and cell differentiation. As a result, HIF transcription factors are stabilized (oxidative stress), and DNA methylation is changed, which leads to severe disturbances in gene expression and to malignant transformations of cells. There are three main biochemical phenotypes of PPGLs: noradrenergic, adrenergic and dopaminergic. According to the tumor type, the patient’s age and family history, complementary genetic testing and molecular visualization are recommended. In clinical practice, the biochemical tumor phenotype, its stage, family history and especially the genetic tumor “passport” allow to choose the best molecular visualization method (SPECT-CT/PET-CT) to personalize treatment and prognosis.
Keywords:
хромаффинные опухоли, феохромоцитома, параганглиома, радионуклидная диагностика, молекулярная визуализация, генетика, эндокринология, онкология, радиология, онкоэндокринология, chromaffin tumors, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, radionuclide diagnostics, molecular visualization, genetics, endocrinology, oncology, radiology, oncoradiology