Медицинская литература. Новинки

 

 

 

 

 

 

Современные аспекты магнитно-резонансной маммографии

Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf

Ключевые слова:

Литература:
1.Трапезников Н.Н., Аксель Е.М. Статистика злокачественных новообразований в России и странах СНГ. М.: ОНЦ РАМН, 2001.
2.Назаренко Г.И., Юрескул И.В., Богданова Е.Г. и др. Современная диагностика заболеваний молочных желез с использованием передовых медицинских технологий // Медицинская визуализация. 2003. № 1. С. 54-61.
3.Friedrich M. MRI of the breast: state of the art // Eur Radiology. 1998. V. 8. P. 707-725.
4.Kuhl C.K. MRI of breast tumors // Eur. Radiology. 2000. V. 10. P. 46-58.
5.Kaiser W.A., Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations // Radiology. 1989. V. 170. P. 681-686.
6.Haase A., Frahm J., Matthaei D. et al. FLASH-imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip angle pulses // J. Magn. Reson. 1986>. V. 67. P. 258-266.
7.Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Dershaw D.D., Schreer I. Diagnostic Breast Imaging. Stuttgart; N.Y.: Thieme, 2001.
8.Harms S.E., Flamig D.P., Hesley K.L. et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation // Radiology. 1993. V. 187. P. 493-501.
9.Pierce W.B., Harms S.E., Flamig D.P. et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast // Radiology. 1991. V. 181. P. 757-763.
10.Friedrich M. MRI of the breast: state of the art // Eur Radiology. 1998. V. 8. P. 707-725.
11.Piccoli C.W., Greer J.G., Mitchell D.G. Breast MR imaging for cancer detection and implant evaluation: Potential pitfalls // Radiographics. 1996. V. 16. P. 63-75.
12.De Angelis G.A., Lange E.E., Miller R.F. MR imaging of breast implants // Radiographics. 1994. V. 14. P. 783-794.
13.Heywang-Kobrunner S.H. Diagnosis of breast cancer with MR-review after 1250 patients examinations // Electromedica. 1993. V. 61. P. 43-52.
14.Kaiser W.A., Reiser M. False-positive cases in dynamic MR mammography // Radiology. 1992. V. 185. P. 245.
15.Boetes C., Barentsz J.O., Mus R.D. et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turbo FLASH subtraction technique // Radiology. 1994. V. 193. P. 777-781.
16.Gilles R., Guinebretiere J.M., Lucidarme O. et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging // Radiology. 1994. V. 191. P. 625-631.
17.Fobben E.S., Rubin C.Z., Kalisher L. et al. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation // Radiology. 1995. V. 196. P. 143-152.
18.Stomper P.C., Herman S., Klippenstein D.L. et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features // Radiology. 1995. V. 197. P. 387-395.
19.Bone B., Aspelin P., Bronge L. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts // Acta Radiol. 1996. V. 37. P. 208-213.
20.Gilles R., Zafrani B., Guinebretiere J.M. et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ. MR imaging-histopathological correlation // Radiology. 1995. V. 196. P. 415-419.
21.Soderstrom C.E., Harms S.E., Copit D.S. et al. Threedimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ // Radiology. 1996. V. 201. P. 427-432.
22.Orel S.G., Medonca M.H., Reynold C. et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ // Radiology. 1997. V. 202. P. 413-420.
23.Качанова Т.Н. Магнитно-резонансная томография молочных желез: Дис.. докт. мед. наук. М.: Российский научный центр рентгенорадиологии, 2000. 218 с.
24.Muller D.M., Barkhausen J., Sauerwein W. et al. Assessment of local recurrence after breast conserving therapy with MRI // J. C. A. T. 1998. V. 22. P. 408-412.
25.Orel S.G., Weinstein S.P., Schnall M.D. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy // Radiology. 1999. V. 212. P. 543-549.
26.Morris E.A. Screening for breast cancer with MRI // Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 2003. V. 24. № 1. P. 45-54.
27.Kuhl C.K., Schmutzler R., Leutner C.C. et al. Breast MR screening in women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results // Radiology. 2000. V. 215. P. 267-276.
28.Назаренко Г.И., Юрескул И.В., Богданова Е.Г. и др. Современная диагностика заболеваний молочной железы с использованием передовых медицинских технологий // Медицинская визуализация. 2003. № 2. С. 54-62.

Current Knowledge of Breast MRI

Experience of contrast-enhanced MRI has significantly increased since its first application in 1986. According to the data of numerous studies, the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MRI is 83-100% and specificity ranges from 29 to 97%. Today, non-contrast MRI is only used to reveal breast implant failure. Breast MRI is used as an adjunct to conventional imaging modalities, particularly, in diagnostic problem cases. Due to high-resolution cross-sectional imaging contrast-enhanced MRI allows to assess the extent of the known tumor, reveal recurrences, determine early effect of chemotherapy. This review summarizes the principles of detection and differential diagnosis of breast tumors using MRI, the current knowledge of breast MRI diagnostic value.

Keywords: