Выход
Вход/Login
 
E-mail
Пароль/Password
Забыли пароль?
Введите E-mail и жмите тут. Пароль будет выслан на указанный адрес
Войти (LogIn)

 

Если вы первый раз здесь, то зарегистрируйтесь

Регистрация/Sign Up
Полное имя (Ф И О)/Full name
E-mail
Телефон/Phone
Зарегистрироваться,
на ваш E-mail будет выслан временный пароль

Нажимая кнопку Зарегистрироваться, вы соглашаетесь с Правилами сайта и Политикой Конфиденциальности http://vidar.ru/rules.asp

 

Медицинская литература. Новинки


 

 

 

 

 

 
вce журналы << Медицинская визуализация << 2009 год << №6 <<
стр.87
отметить
статью

Роль магнитно-резонансной томографии и клинического обследования в диагностике повреждений менисков коленного сустава

В.Б. Богатов
Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf
Богатов Виктор Борисович – канд. мед. наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела новых технологий в ортопедии ФГУ “Саратовский научноисследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии Росмедтехнологий”.
Адрес для корреспонденции: Богатов Виктор Борисович – 410008 Саратов, ул. 2-й Детский проезд, д. 29/41, кв.157. Тел. 8-905-385-25-42, (8452) 52-63-25. E-mail: vicbogatov@rambler.ru

Магнитно-резонансная томография (МРТ) и клини ческий осмотр являются ведущими при постановке диагноза повреждения менисков коленного сустава. Мы провели анализ эффективности каждого из методов, основываясь на данных мировой литературы. В обзор вошли 32 литературных источника, посвященных данной тематике. Показано, что клинический диагноз разрыва мениска, поставленный опытным врачом-травматологом, равнозначен или даже превосходит результаты МРТ-исследования.

Ключевые слова:
коленный сустав, повреждения мениска, магнитно-резонансная томография, клиническая диагноcтика.

Литература:
1. Greis P.E., Bardana D.D., Holmstrom M.C. Meniscal injury:
Basic science and evaluation. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.
2002; 10:168–176.
2. O’Shea K.J., Murphy K.P., Heekin R.D. et. al. The diagnostic accuracy of history, physical examination, and radiographs in the evaluation of traumatic knee disorders. Am.
J. Sports Med. 1996; 24:164–167.
3. Weinstabl R., Mueller T., Vescei V. et al. Economic considerations for the diagnosis and therapy of meniscal lesions:
can magnetic resonance imaging help reduce expense?
Wld J. Surg. 1997; 21:363–368.
4. BuiMansfield L.T., Youngberg R.A., Warme W. et al.
Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before
arthroscopy of the knee: evaluation of 50 consecutive
patients. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 913–918.
5. Gluckert K., Klandy B., BlankSchal A. et al. MRI of the
knee joint with a 3D gradient echo sequence. Equivalent
to diagnostic arthroscopy? Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.
1992; 112: 5–14.
6. Grevitt M.P., Pool C.J., Bodley R.N. et al Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: initial experience in a district
general hospital. Injury 1992; 23: 410–412.
7. LaPrade R.F., Burnett Q.M., Veestra M.A. et al. The prevalence of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings
in asymptomatic knees. With correlation of magnetic resonance imaging to arthroscopic findings in symptomatic
knees. Am. J. Sports Med. 1994; 22: 739–745.
8. Lundenberg M., Odesten M., Thuomas K.A. et al. The
diagnostic validity of magnetic resonance imaging in
acute knee injuries with hemarthrosis. A single-blinded
evaluation in 69 patients using highfield MRI before
arthroscopy. Int. J. Sports Med. 1996; 17: 218–222.
9. Rappeport E.D, Weislander S.B., Stephensen S. et al. MRI
preferable to diagnostic arthroscopy in knee joint injuries.
A doubleblind comparison of 47 patients. Acta Orthop.
Scand. 1997; 68: 277–281.
10. Riel K.A., Reinisch M., Hof N. et al. 0.2-Tesla magnetic
resonance imaging of internal lesions of the knee joint:
a prospective arthroscopically controlled clinical study.
Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 37–41.
11. Shiozaki Y., Horibe S., Mitsuoka T. et al. Prediction of
reparability of isolated semilunar lateral meniscus tears by
magneti resonance imaging. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol.
Arthrsc. 2002; 10: 213–217.
12. Akseki D., Ozcan O., Boya H. et al. A new weight-bearing
meniscal test and a comparison with MCMurray’s test and
joint line tenderness. Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 951–958.
13. Corea J.V., Moussa M., Othman A. et al. Mac Murray’s test
tested. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 1994; 2:
70–72.
14. McNally E.G., Nasser K.N., Dawson S. et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical management of the
acutely locked knee. Skeletal. Radiol. 2002; 31: 570–573.
15. Eren O.T. The accuracy of joint line tenderness by physical
examination in the diagnosis of meniscal tears.
Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 850–854.
16. Evans P.J., Frank C., Bell G.D. Prospective evaluationof the
McMurray test. Am. J. Sports Med. 1993; 21: 604–608.
17. Fowler P.J., Lubliner J.A. The prospective value of five clinical signs in the evaluation of meniscal pathology.
Arthroscopy 1989; 5: 184–186.
18. Karachalios T., Hantes M., Zibis A.H. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early detection of meniscal tears. J. Bone J. Surg. Am. 2005; 87:
955–962.
19. Brooks S., Morgan M. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in knee
arthroscopyю Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2002; 84: 265–268.
20. Bryan S., Weatherburn G., Bungay H. et al. The cost effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging for investigation
of the knee joint. Hlth Technol. Assess. 2001; 5: 1–15.
21. Elvens J., Jerome C.P., Johansen O. Magnetic resonance
imaging as a screening procedure to avoid arthroscopy for
meniscal tears. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2000; 120:
14–16.
22. Esmaili J.A.A., Keyhani S., Zarei R. et al. The accuracy of
MRI in comparison with clinical and arthroscopic findings
in ligamentous and meniscal injuries of the knee. Acta
Orthop. Belg. 2005; 71: 189–196.
23. Gelb H.J., Glasgow S.G., Sapega A.A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee disorders. Clinical value and
cost effectiveness in a sports medicine practice. Am. J.
Sports Med. 1996; 24: 99–103.
24. Kocabey Y. Tetik O., Isbell W.M. et al. The value of clinical
examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the
diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament
rupture. Arthroscopy 2004; 20: 696–700.
25. Miller G.K. A prospective study comparing the accuracy of
the clinical diagnosis of meniscus tear with magnetic resonance imaging and its effect on clinical outcome.
Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 406–413.
26. Muellner T., Weinstabl R., Schabus R. et al. The diagnosis
of meniscal tears in athletes. A comparison of clinical and
magnetic resonance imaging investigations. Am. J. Sports
Med. 1997; 25: 7–12.
27. Munk B. Madsen F., Lundorf E. et al. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in knees:
a comparative prospective study of meniscus, anterior
cruciate ligament and cartilage lesions. Arthroscopy
1998; 14: 171–175.
28. Rose N.E., Gold S.M. A comparison of accuracy between
clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in
the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament
tears. Arthroscopy 1996; 12: 398–405.
29. Spiers A.S., Meagher T., Ostlere S.J. et al. Can MRI of the
knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of
58 patients. J. Bone J. Surg. Br. 1993; 75: 49–52.
30. Dervin G.F., Steill I.G., Wells G.A. et al. Physicians accuracy and interrator reliability for the diagnosis of unstable
meniscal tears in patients having osteoarthritis of the
knee. Can. J. Surg. 2001; 44: 267–274.
31. Abdon P., Lindstrand A., Thorgen K.G. Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for meniscal tears. Int. Orthop.
1990; 14: 341–345.
32. Casscells S.W. The place of arthroscopy in the diagnosis
and treatment of internal derangement of the knee: an
analysis of 1000 cases. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1980;
151: 135–142.
33. Critchley I.J., Bracey D.J. The acutely locked knee –
is manipulation worth while? Injury 1985; 16: 281–283.
34. Hataba T., Uematsu K., Hattori K. et al. Clinical features of
the posterior horn tear in the medial meniscus. Arch.
Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2004; 124: 642–645.
35. Johnson L.L., Johnson A.L., Colquitt J.A. et al. Is it possible to make an accurate diagnosis based only on medical
history? A pilot study on women’s knee joints, Arthroscopy
1996; 12: 709–714.
36. Shakespear D.T., Rigby H.S. The buckethandle tear of
the meniscus. A clinical and arthrographic study. J. Bone
J. Surg. Br. 1983; 65: 383–387.
37. Applegate G.R., Flinnigan B.D., Tolin B.S. et al. MR diagnosis of recurrent tears in the knee: valueof intraarticular
contrast material. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 821–825.
38. Vives M.J., Homesley D., Ciccotti M.G., Schweitzer M.E.
Evaluation of recurring meniscal tears with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized,
prospective study. Am. J. Sports Med.; 31(6): 868–873.
39. Fischer S.P., Fox J.M., Del Pizzo W. et al. Accuracy diagnosis from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.
A multicenter analysis of one thousand and fourteen
patients. J. Bone J. Surg. Am. 1991; 73: 2–10.
40. White L.M., Schweitzer M.E., Deely D.M. et al. The effect
of training and experience on the magnetic resonance
imaging interpretation of meniscal tears. Arthroscopy
1997; 13: 224–228.
41. Magee T., Shapiro M., Williams D. et al. MR accuracy and
arthroscopic incidence of meniscal radial tears. Skeletal.
Radiol. 2002; 31: 686–689.
42. Ohishi T., Takahashi M., Abe M. et al. The use of axial
reconstruction images from threedimensional MRI
datasets for morphological diagnosis of meniscal tears of
the knee. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2005; 125: 622–627.
43. Yu J.S., Cosgarea A.J., Kaeding C.C. et al. Meniscal
flounce MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 203: 513–515.
44. Boden S.D., Davis D.O., Dina T.S. et al. A prospective and
blinded investigation of magnetic resonanse imaging of
the knee. Abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects.
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1992; 282: 177–185.
45. Kornik J., Trefelner E., McCarthy S. et al. Meniscal abnormalities in the asymptomatic population at MR imaging.
Radiology 1990; 177: 463–465.
46. Zanetti M., Pfirrmann C.W., Schmid M.R. et al. Patients
with suspected meniscal tears: prevalence of abnormalities seen on MRI of 100 symptomatic and 100 contralateral asymptomatic knees. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003; 181:
635–641.
47. Crues J.V., Mink J., Levy T.L. et al. Meniscal tears of the
knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology 1987; 164:
445–448.
48. De Smet A.A., Graf B.K. Meniscal tears missed on MR
imaging: relationship to meniscal tear patterns and anterior cruciate ligaments tears. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994;
162: 905–911.
49. Solomon D.H., Simel D.H., Bates D.W. et al. The rational
clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of physical examination. J.A.M.A. 2001; 286: 1610–1620.
50. Jerosch J., Reimer S. How good are clinical investigative
procedures for diagnosing meniscus lesions? Sportverletz
Sportschaden 2004; 18: 59–67.
51. Shelbourne K.D., Martini D.J., McCarroll J.R. et al.
Correlation of joint line tenderness and meniscal lesions in
patients with acute anterior cruciate ligaments tears. Am J
Sports Med. 1995; 23: 166–169.
52. De Smet A.A., Norris M.A., Graf B.K. et al. MR diagnosis of
meniscal tears of the knee: importance of high signal in
the meniscus that extends to the surface. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 101–107.
53. Rubin D.A., Kettering J.M., Towers J.D. et al. MR imaging
of knees having isolated and combined ligament injuries.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998; 170: 1207–1213.
54. Clark C.R., Ogden J.A. Development of the menisci of the
human knee joint. Morphological changes and their
potential role in childhood meniscal injury. J. Bone J. Surg
Am. 1983; 65: 538–547.
55. Takeda Y., Ikata T., Yoshida S. et al. MRI high-signal intensity in the menisci of asymptomatic children. J. Bone J.
Surg Br. 1998; 80: 463–467.
56. Luhmann S.J., Schootman M., Gordon J.E. et al. Magnetic
resonance imaging of the knee in children and adolescents. Its role in clinical decision – making. J. Bone J.
Surg. Am. 2005; 87:4 97–502.
57. Mattava M.J., Eck K., Totty W. et al. Magnetic resonance
imaging as a tool to predict meniscal reparability. Am. J.
Sports Med. 1999; 27: 436–443.
58. Muscolo D.L., Auerza M.A., Makino A. et al. Tumors about
the knee misdiagnosed as athletic injuries. J. Bone J.
Surg. Am. 2003; 85: 1209–1214.
59. Winters K., Tregonning R. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging of the traumatic knee as determined by
arthroscopy. N. Z. Med. J. 2005; 118: 1300–1301.

The Role of MRI and Clinical Examination in the Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears

V.B. Bogatov

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical examination are tools commonly used in the diagnosis of meniscal tears. We designed a systematic review of prospective studies comparing MRI and clinical examination to arthroscopy to diagnosis meniscus tears. Thirty-two relevant studies were identified by a literature review. Careful evaluation by an experienced examiner identifies patients with surgically treatable meniscus lesions with equal or better reliability than MRI. MRI is useful, but should be reserved for situations in wich an experienced clinician requires further information before arriving at a diagnosis.

Keywords:
knee joint, meniscus tears, MRI, clinical examination.

Новости   Магазин   Журналы   Контакты   Правила   Доставка   О компании  
ООО Издательский дом ВИДАР-М, 2024