Медицинская литература. Новинки

 

 

 

 

 

 

Компьютерная томография печени. Анализ двадцатилетнего опыта

Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf

В статье описана двадцатилетняя история применения КТ для исследовании печени. Сделана попытка оценки современного состояния метода и определения его возможностей в изучении природы патологических образований печени, ее сосудистой системы, объемов резекций и т.д. Рассмотрен вклад технических нововведений в диагностическую эффективность. На основании собственного опыта и литературных данных продемонстрирована ведущая роль КТ в неинвазивной морфологической оценке печени

Ключевые слова:
компьютерная томография, печень, контрастные вещества.

Литература:
1. Alfidi R.J., Haaga J.R., Havrilla T.R. et al. Computed
tomography of the liver. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1976; 127 (1):
69–74.
2. Freeny P.C., Marks W.M. Hepatic hemangioma: dynamic
bolus CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1986; 147 (4): 711–719.
3. Itai Y., Araki T., Furui S. et al. Differential diagnosis of
hepatic masses on computed tomography, with particular
reference to hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Comput. Assist.
Tomogr. 1981; 5 (6): 834–842.
4. Moss A. A., Schrumpf J., Schnyder P. et al. Computed
tomography of focal hepatic lesions: a blind clinical evaluation of the effect of contrast enhancement. Radiology.
1979; 131 (2): 427–430.
5. Yeh H.C., Rabinowitz J.G. Ultrasonography and computed
tomography of the liver. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 1980; 18 (2):
321–338.
6. Smith T. J., Kemeny M.M., Sugarbaker P. H. et al.
A prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of
metastatic disease. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1982; 195 (4):
486–491.
7. Levitt R.G., Sagel S.S., Stanley R.J. et al. Accuracy of
computed tomography of the liver and biliary tract.
Radiology. 1977; 124 (1): 123–128.
8. Miles K.A., Hayball M. P., Dixon A.K. Functional images of
hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology.
1993; 188 (2): 405–411.
9. D'Agincourt L. Spiral scan capability increases utility of CT.
Diagn. Imaging (SanFranc.). 1991; 13 (3): 98–104.
10. Paushter D.M., Zeman R. K., Scheibler M.L. et al. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of
techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 1989; 152 (2): 267–271.
11. Soyer P., Levesque M., Elias D. et al. Detection of liver
metastases from colorectal cancer: comparison of intraoperative US and CT during arterial portography.
Radiology. 1992; 183 (2): 541–544.
12. Mita K., Kim S. R., Kudo M. et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of
imaging modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma smaller
than 2 cm. Wld J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 7 (33): 4187–4192.
13. Itai Y., Saida Y. Pitfalls in liver imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2002;
12: 1162–1174.
14. Rieber A., Brambs H.J., G rich J. et al. Intra-arterial
angioCT as a perfusion control before intra-arterial
chemotherapy in bronchial, breast and liver tumors. R fo.
1991; 154 (5): 514–517.
15. NinoMurcia M., Olcott E.W., Jeffrey R.B. et al. Focal liver
lesions: patternbased classification scheme for enhancement at arterial phase CT. Radiology. 2000; 215 (3):
746–751.
16. Martino D.M., Filippis D.G, Santis D.A. et al. Hepatocellular
carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: prospective comparison of
US, CT and MR imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2012; 18 URL http://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1007%2Fs00330012-2691-z# (дата обращения: 15.02.2013).
17. Kamel I.R., Choti M.A., Horton K.M. et al. Surgically
Staged Focal Liver Lesions: Accuracy and Reproducibility
of DualPhase Helical CT for Detection and
Characterization. Radiology. 2003; 227 (3): 752–757.
18. Kaneko K., Nishie A., Arima F. et al. A case of diffuse-type
primary hepatic lymphoma mimicking diffuse hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Nucl. Med. 2011; 25 (4): 303–307.
19. Nakayama A., Imamura H., Matsuyama Y. et al. Value of
Lipiodol Computed Tomography and Digital Subtraction
Angiography in the Era of Helical Biphasic Computed
Tomography as Preoperative Assessment of Hepatocellular
Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2001; 234 (1): 56–62.
20. Kopka L., Rodenwaldt J., Fischer U. et al. Dual-phase
helical CT of the liver: effects of bolus tracking and different volumes of contrast material. Radiology. 1996;
201 (2): 321–326.
21. Mehnert F., Pereira P.L., Trubenbach J. et al. Automatic
bolus tracking in monophasic spiral CT of the liver: liverto-lesion conspicuity. Eur. Radiol. 2001; 11 (4): 580–584.
22. Ringe K.I., Ringe B.P., von Falck C et al. Evaluation of living liver donors using contrast enhanced multidetector
CT – The radiologists impact on donor selection. BMC
Med. Imaging. 2012; 12: 21.
23. Saylisoy S., Atasoy C., Ersoz S. et al. Multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of hepatic vascular anatomy in
potential right lobe donors. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2005;
11 (1): 51–59.
24. Sandrasegaran K., Kwo P.W., DiGirolamo D. et al. Measurement of liver volume using spiral CT and the curved
line and cubic spline algorithms: reproducibility and interobserver variation. Abdom. Imaging. 1999; 24 (1): 61–65.
25. Колганова И.П., Осипова Н.Ю., Сидорова Е.Е. и др.
Очаговые образования печени. Вопросы лучевой
диагностики. Классика. Будущее. Мед. виз. 2008; 2:
139–142.
Kolganova I.P., Osipova N. Ju., Sidorova E.E. Focal liver
lesions. Questions of radiology. Classics. The future. Med.
viz. 2008; 2: 139–142.

Liver Computed Tomography. The Analysis of 20 Years Experience

The history of liver CT over 20 year period was adduced. The estimation of method state and its efficiency in diagnosis of liver lesions, vascular anatomy evaluation, resection volume assessment, is presented. Also, we take a look at impact of technical innovations in diagnostic accuracy. The leading role of CT in noninvasive morphological assesment of the liver was demonstrated on the ground of self and global expirience.

Keywords:
computed tomography, liver disease, contrast agents.