Медицинская литература. Новинки

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ультразвуковая диагностика добавочного полостного внутриматочного образования: клинические наблюдения и обзор литературы

Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf

Цель исследования: обзор литературы и собственного опыта диагностики аномалии развития мюллерова протока ACUM (accessory cavitated uterine mass) – добавочного полостного внутриматочного образования. Отсутствие единых данных относительно названия, классификации, методов диагностики и лечения делает данную аномалию актуальной для мультидисциплинарного изучения.

Ключевые слова:
аномалии мюллерова протока, добавочное полостное внутриматочное образование, ACUM, трехмерная эхография, эхографические признаки, mullerian duct anomalies, ACUM, three-dimensional ultrasound, ultrasound features

Литература:
1.Acien P., Acien M., Fernandez F. et al. The cavitated accessory uterine mass: a Mullerian anomaly in women with an otherwise normal uterus. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116 (5):1101–1109. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f7e735
2.Acien P., Acien M. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Human Reprod. Update. 2016; 22 (1): 48–69. http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv048
3.Timmerman S., Stubbe L., Bosch T. et al. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation (ACUM): A scoping review. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2024; 103 (6): 1036–1045. http://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14801
4.Mondal R., Bhave P. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation: Enhancing awareness about this unexplored perpetrator of dysmenorrhea. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023; 162 (2): 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14681
5.Strug M., Christmas A., Schoonover A. et al. Impact of an accessory cavitated uterine mass on fertility: case presentation and review of the literature. F&S Reports. 2023; 4 (4): 402–409. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2023.09.001
6.Bazot M., Darai E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2018; 109 (3): 389–397. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024
7.Merviel P., Lelievre C., Cambier T. et al. The first ethanol sclerotherapy of an accessory cavitated uterine mass. Clin. Case Rep. 2020; 9 (1): 19–22. http://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.3371
8.Grimbizis G., Gordts S., Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol. Surg. 2013; 10 (3): 199–212. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0800-x
9.Pfeifer S., Attaran M., Goldstein J. et al. ASRM mullerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116 (5): 1238–1252. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025
10.Acien P., Acien M. Accessory and cavitated uterine mass versus juvenile cystic adenomyoma. F&S Reports. 2021; 2 (3): 357–358. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2021.06.006
11.Naftalin J., Bean E., Saridogan E. et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (21): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of accessory cavitated uterine malformations. Ultrasound Obstetet. Gynecol. 2021; 57 (5): 821–828. http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22173
12.Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I. et al. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94 (3): 862–868. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010
13.Rackow B. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: a new mullerian anomaly? Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 649–650. http://doi.org/1011.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.006
14.Acien P., Bataller A., Fernandez F. et al. New cases of accessory and cavitated uterine masses (ACUM): a significant cause of severe dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain in young women. Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27 (3): 683–694. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der471
15.Dekkiche S., Dubruc E., Kanbar M. et al. Accessory and cavitated uterine masses: a case series and review of the literature. Front. Reprod. Health. 2023; 5: 1197931. http://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1197931
16.Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I. et al. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94 (3): 862–868. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010
17.Arya S., Burks H. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma, a rare diagnostic challenge: Case Reports and literature review. F&S Reports. 2021; 2 (2): 166–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2021.02.002
18.Mondal R., Bhave P. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation: Enhancing awareness about this unexplored perpetrator of dysmenorrhea. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023; 162 (2): 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14681
19.Macer M., Taylor H. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2012; 39 (4): 535-549. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002
20.Ahmed A., Swan R., Owen A. et al. Uterus-like mass arising in the broad ligament: a metaplasia or mullerian duct anomaly? Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1997; 16 (3): 279–281. http://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199707000-00015
21.Tokgoz V., Tekin A. A rare case of the new entity of mullerian anomalies mimicking the noncommunicating rudimentary cavity with hemi-uterus: accessory cavitated uterine mass. Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 646–648. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.028
22.Nishiuchi K., Uotani K., Kobayashi D. et al. Uterine diverticulum mimicking endometriotic cyst of the ovary. Radiol. Case Rep. 2023; 19 (3): 934–938. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.11.023
23.Stockwell E. Decidualized juvenile cystic adenomyoma mimicking a cornual heterotopic pregnancy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28 (11): 6726. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.09.121
24.Dekkiche S., Dubruc E., Kanbar M. et al. Accessory and cavitated uterine masses: a case series and review of the literature. Front. Reprod. Health. 2023; 5: 1197931. http://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1197931
25.Peyron N., Jacquemier E., Charlot M. et al. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: MRI features and surgical correlations of a rare but under-recognised entity. Eur. Radiol. 2019; 29 (3): 1144–1152. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5686-6
26.Mollion M., Host A., Faller E. et al. Report of two cases of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Mass (ACUM): Diagnostic challenge for MRI. Radiol. Case Rep. 2021; 16 (11): 3465–3469. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.07.071
27.Rackow B. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: a new mullerian anomaly? Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 649–650. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.006
28.Peters A., Rindos N., Guido R., Donnellan N. Uterine-sparing Laparoscopic Resection of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Masses. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25 (1): 24–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.001
29.Strelec M., Banovic M., Banovic V., Sirovec A. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma mimicking a Mullerian uterine anomaly successfully treated by laparoscopic excision. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019; 146 (2): 265–266. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12880
30.Park J., Kim D. Successful laparoscopic surgery of accessory cavitated uterine mass in young women with severe dysmenorrhea. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2021; 38 (3): 235–239. http://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00696
31.Protopapas A., Kypriotis K., Chatzipapas I. et al. Juvenile Cystic Adenomyoma vs Blind Uterine Horn: Challenges in the Diagnosis and Surgical Management. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2020; 33 (6): 735–738. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.08.010
32.Bakshi N., Dhawan S. Extrapelvic ''Uterus Like Mass'' Following Laparoscopic Morcellation Hysterectomy – a Consequence of Iatrogenic Implantation? Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2023; 31 (5): 791–794. http://doi.org/10.1177/10668969221133350
33.Supermaniam S., Thye W. Diagnosis and laparoscopic excision of accessory cavitated uterine mass in young women: Two case reports. Case Rep. Womens Health. 2020; 26: e00187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00187
34.Strug M., Christmas A., Schoonover A. et al. Impact of an accessory cavitated uterine mass on fertility: case presentation and review of the literature. F&S Reports. 2023; 4 (4): 402–409. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2023.09.001
35.Hu Y., Wang A., Chen J. Diagnosis and laparoscopic excision of accessory cavitated uterine mass in a young woman: A case report. Wld J. Clin. Cases. 2021; 9 (30): 9122–9128. http://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i30.9122
36.Bakshi N., Dhawan S. Extrapelvic “Uterus Like Mass” Following Laparoscopic Morcellation Hysterectomy – a Consequence of Iatrogenic Implantation? Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2023; 31 (5): 791–794. http://doi.org/10.1177/10668969221133350

Ultrasound of accessory and cavitated uterine mass (ACUM): clinical cases and literature review

The purpose of this article is a review of literature and our own experience in diagnosing of Mullerian duct anomaly – accessory and cavitated uterine mass (ACUM). The lack of uniform approach to the terminology, classification, methods of diagnosis and treatment makes this anomaly relevant for a multidisciplinary evaluation.

Keywords:
аномалии мюллерова протока, добавочное полостное внутриматочное образование, ACUM, трехмерная эхография, эхографические признаки, mullerian duct anomalies, ACUM, three-dimensional ultrasound, ultrasound features