Медицинская литература. Новинки

 

 

 

 

 

 

Результаты внутреннего дренирования псевдокист поджелудочной железы под контролем эндо-УЗИ

Вы можете загрузить полный текст статьи в формате pdf

Цель. Провести сравнительный анализ ближайших и отдаленных результатов внутреннего дренирования псевдокист поджелудочной железы под контролем эндо-УЗИ и открытых дренирующих операций. Материал и методы. С 2011 по 2016 г. 32 больным выполнено внутреннее дренирование псевдокист поджелудочной железы под контролем эндо-УЗИ. Другим 32 пациентам выполнены открытые дренирующие операции. Результаты. В группе эндоскопического дренирования уровень технического успеха составил 97%, уровень клинического успеха - 85%, уровень осложнений - 26%. В отдаленном периоде рецидива псевдокист не отмечено. Сравнительный анализ с группой открытых операций показал преимущество эндоскопического метода в продолжительности операции (p 0,01), величине кровопотери (p 0,01) и продолжительности пребывания больных в стационаре (p 0,01). Заключение. Внутреннее дренирование под контролем эндо-УЗИ как метод устранения псевдокист поджелудочной железы в рамках комплексного лечения хронического панкреатита характеризуется высоким уровнем технического и клинического успеха при низкой частоте осложнений и отсутствии рецидива в отдаленном периоде.

Ключевые слова:
поджелудочная железа, хронический панкреатит, острый панкреатит, псевдокиста, эндоскопическое дренирование, эндо-УЗИ, стентирование, pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, acute pancreatitis, pseudocyst, endoscopic drainage, endosonography, stenting

Литература:
1.Baron T.H., Thaggard W.G., Morgan D.E., Stanley R.J. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111 (3): 755-764.
2.Kloppel G. Pseudocysts and other non-neoplastic cysts of the pancreas. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2000; 17 (1): 7-15.
3.Arvanitakis M., Delhaye M., Chamlou R., Matos C., Closset J., Medhi A., Baize M., Le Moine O., Deviere J. Endoscopic therapy for main pancreatic-duct rupture after Silastic-ring vertical gastroplasty. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2005; 62 (1): 143-151.
4.Baron T.H., Harewood G.C., Morgan D.E., Yates M.R. Outcome differences after endoscopic drainage of pancreatic necrosis, acute pancreatic pseudocysts, and chronic pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56 (1): 7-17.
5.Gouyon B., Levy P., Ruszniewski P., Zins M., Hammel P., Vilgrain V., Sauvanet A., Belghiti J., Bernades P. Predictive factors in the outcome of pseudocysts complicating alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Gut. 1997; 41 (6): 821-825.
6.Yeo C.J., Bastidas J.A., Lynch-Nyhan A., Fishman E.K., Zinner M.J., Cameron J.L. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1990; 170 (5): 411-417.
7.Warshaw A.L., Rattner D.W. Timing of surgical drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Clinical and chemical criteria. Ann. Surg. 1985; 202 (6): 720-724.
8.Bradley E.L., 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Ann. Chir. 1993; 47 (6): 537-541.
9.Boerma D., van Gulik T.M., Obertop H., Gouma D.J. Internal drainage of infected pancreatic pseudocysts: safe or sorry? Dig. Surg. 1999; 16 (6): 501-505.
10.Ahearne P.M., Baillie J.M., Cotton P.B., Baker M.E., Meyers W.C., Pappas T.N. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am. J. Surg. 1992; 163 (1): 111-115; discussion 115-116.
11.Adams D.B., Harvey T.S., Anderson M.C. Percutaneous catheter drainage of infected pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections. Arch. Surg. 1990; 125 (12): 1554-1557.
12.Singhal S., Rotman S.R., Gaidhane M., Kahaleh M. Pancreatic fluid collection drainage by endoscopic ultrasound: an update. Clin. Endosc. 2013; 46 (5): 506-514. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.506.
13.Antillon M.R., Shah R.J., Stiegmann G., Chen Y.K. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of simple and complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 63 (6): 797-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.10.025.
14.Sanchez Cortes E., Maalak A., Le Moine O., Baize M., Delhaye M., Matos C., Deviere J. Endoscopic cystenterostomy of nonbulging pancreatic fluid collections. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56 (3): 380-386.
15.Baron T.H. Drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: is EUS really necessary? Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 66 (6): 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.014.
16.Giovannini M. What is the best endoscopic treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts? Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65 (4): 620-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.046.
17.Замолодчиков Р.Д., Солодинина Е.Н., Старков Ю.Г. Внутреннее дренирование псевдокист поджелудочной железы. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2015; 4: 68-75.
18.Varadarajulu S., Christein J.D., Wilcox C.M. Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; 26 (10): 1504-1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06771.x.
19.Ahn J.Y., Seo D.W., Eum J., Song T.J., Moon S.H., Park do H., Lee S.S., Lee S.K., Kim M.H. Single-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: Analysis of technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety. Gut Liver. 2010; 4 (4): 524-529. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl.2010.4.4.524.
20.Puri R., Mishra S.R., Thandassery R.B., Sud R., Eloubeidi M.A. Outcome and complications of endoscopic ultrasound guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage using combined endoprosthesis and naso-cystic drain. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 27 (4): 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2012.07089.x.
21.Kunzli H.T., Timmer R., Schwartz M.P., Witteman B.J., Weusten B.L., van Oijen M.G., Siersema P.D., Vleggaar F.P. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage is an effective and relatively safe treatment for peripancreatic fluid collections in a cohort of 108 symptomatic patients. Eur. J. Gastroenterol.Hepatol. 2013; 25 (8): 958-963. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283612f03.
22.Kato S., Katanuma A., Maguchi H., Takahashi K., Osanai M., Yane K., Kim T., Kaneko M., Takaki R., Matsumoto K., Matsumori T., Gon K., Tomonari A. Efficacy, safety, and longterm follow-up results of EUS-guided transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocyst. Diagn. Ther. Endosc. 2013; 2013: 924291. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/924291.
23.Shamah S., Okolo P.I., 3rd. Systematic review of endoscopic cyst gastrostomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 2018; 28 (4): 477-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2018.06.002.
24.Vosoghi M., Sial S., Garrett B., Feng J., Lee T., Stabile B.E., Eysselein V.E. EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage: review and experience at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. Med. Gen. Med. 2002; 4 (3): 2.
25.Pitchumoni C.S., Agarwal N. Pancreatic pseudocysts. When and how should drainage be performed? Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 1999; 28 (3): 615-639.
26.Bradley E.L., Clements J.L., Jr., Gonzalez A.C. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management. Am. J. Surg. 1979; 137 (1): 135-141.
27.Bradley E.L., Gonzalez A.C., Clements J.L., Jr. Acute pancreatic pseudocysts: incidence and implications. Ann. Surg. 1976; 184 (6): 734-737.
28.Itoi T., Binmoeller K.F., Shah J., Sofuni A., Itokawa F., Kurihara T., Tsuchiya T., Ishii K., Tsuji S., Ikeuchi N., Moriyasu F. Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75 (4): 870-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.020.
29.Gornals J.B., De la Serna-Higuera C., Sanchez-Yague A., Loras C., Sanchez-Cantos A.M., Perez-Miranda M. Endosonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with a novel lumen-apposing stent. Surg. Endosc. 2013; 27 (4): 1428-1434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2591-y.
30.Petrone M.C., Archibugi L., Forti E., Conigliaro R., Di Mitri R., Tarantino I., Fabbri C., Larghi A., Testoni S.G.G., Mutignani M., Arcidiacono P.G. Novel lumen-apposing metal stent for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: An Italian multicentre experience. Un. Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018; 6 (9): 1363-1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618785078.
31.Yang J., Chen Y.I., Friedland S., Holmes I., Paiji C., Law R., Hosmer A., Stevens T., Matheus F., Pawa R., Mathur N., Sejpal D., Inamdar S., Berzin T.M., DiMaio C.J., Gupta S., Yachimski P.S., Anderloni A., Repici A., James T., Jamil L.H., Ona M., Lo S.K., Gaddam S., Dollhopf M., Alammar N., Shieh E., Bukhari M., Kumbhari V., Singh V., Brewer O., Sanaei O., Fayad L., Ngamruengphong S., Shin E.J., Baron T.H., Khashab M.A. Lumen-apposing stents versus plastic stents in the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: a large, comparative, international, multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0759-1353.
32.Varadarajulu S., Bang J.Y., Phadnis M.A., Christein J.D., Wilcox C.M. Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2011; 15 (11): 2080-2088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1621-8.
33.Yao Y., Zhang D., Guo J., Qi K., Li F., Zhu J., Wang D., Chen J., Xu C., Wang L., Wang K., Jin Z., Li Z. A novel selfexpanding biflanged metal stent vs tubular metal stent for EUSguided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: A retrospective, cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98 (3): e14179. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014179.
34.Arvanitakis M., Delhaye M., Bali M.A., Matos C., De Maertelaer V., Le Moine O., Deviere J. Pancreatic-fluid collections: a randomized controlled trial regarding stent removal after endoscopic transmural drainage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65 (4): 609-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.083.

The results of endosonography-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst

Aim. To compare immediate and long-term results of internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst by using of endosonography-assisted and open surgical approaches. Material and methods. EUS-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst was performed in 32 patients in 2011-2016. Open drainage procedures were carried out on the other 32 patients. Results. In the group of endoscopic drainage, technical success rate, clinical success rate and complication rate were 97%, 85% and 26%, respectively. There were no recurrent pseudocysts in long-term period. Comparison with open surgery confirmed advantages of endoscopic technique regarding time of operation (p 0.01), intraoperative blood loss (p 0.01) and length of hospital-stay (p 0.01). Conclusion. EUS-assisted internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis is characterized by high rate of technical and clinical success, small postoperative morbidity and low incidence of longterm recurrences.

Keywords:
поджелудочная железа, хронический панкреатит, острый панкреатит, псевдокиста, эндоскопическое дренирование, эндо-УЗИ, стентирование, pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, acute pancreatitis, pseudocyst, endoscopic drainage, endosonography, stenting