Новости | Магазин | Журналы | Контакты | Правила | Доставка | |
Вход Регистрация |
Ключевые слова:
Литература:
1.Щеплев П.А., Курбатов Д.Г. Малый половой член - методы коррекции. М.: РОСМЭН, 2003. 191 с.
2.Porst H. Penile Disorders. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1997. P. 251-275.
3.Wessels H., Lue T.F., McAninch J.W. Penile length in flaccid and erect states: guidelines for penile augmentation // J. Urol. 1996. V. 156. P. 995-997.
4.Santos B.O.F., Correa M.A., Heller N. Endoscopic plastic surgery for penile enhancement // 1st International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgery in Congenital Malformations, Transsexuals and Impotence. Spain, April, 6-8, 1998.
5.Островерхов Г.Е., Лубоцкий Д.Н., Бомаш Ю.М. Оперативная хирургия и топографическая анатомия. М.: Медицина, 1972. С. 663-668.
To predict results of augmentation falloplasty authors performed MRI of pubis area at the 56 patients prior to operation. There were established three anatomical types of cavernous bodies fixating to oss pubis with suspender ligament including high type, low type and intermediate type. Authors compared these results with outcomes of operations reached at the patients. It was established that the men with high types of penis fixating had better gains of penile augmentation. Worst outcome of the penile lengthening was at the men with low types of penis fixating. Middle results were achieved in the patients with intermediate type. Conclusion: establishing penile fixating types with MRI prior to operation can help surgeons to choose the correct method of augmentation falloplasty.
Keywords: